The Impact of the Ukraine Crisis on New Jersey Congressional Elections – Especially Malinowski v Kean, Jr.
Just 26% say the U.S. should have a major role in the Ukraine conflict, according to a new national poll from The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research. Fifty-two percent say a minor role; 20% say none at all.
For students of the interplay of American politics and foreign policy, this result is hardly a surprise.
Americans in the 21st century are not isolationist. They are willing to send American troops into foreign conflicts if they perceive some American national security interest to be at risk. Such intervention would be defined in this poll as a “major role.”
They also are willing to be involved in mediation, economic sanctions, and military and non-military financial assistance in foreign conflicts not involving American national security interests, as long as American troops do not participate in the conflict. Such involvement would have the purposes of international peace and good order and be defined in the above poll as a “minor role.”
The political dilemma for Biden is what choice does he have if a minor role inadvertently widens into a major role. The prime risk of such an expansion of the American role is likely to result from the sending of troops by Biden to Europe to bolster NATO forces.
Biden has pledged that these troops will not be involved in any direct conflict with Russia over Ukraine. If an inadvertent clash occurs between an American NATO ally and Russia over Ukraine, however, then Biden will find his administration dragged into a major Ukraine role because of NATO and Article 5 – the covenant in the agreement that an attack on one NATO member is an attack on all.
Thus far, Biden is winning public approval even from those who have criticisms of his Ukraine policies, including myself, because of his adept diplomacy in forging American and international unity. This unity includes our European allies. If an American major role is avoided, Biden’s Ukraine policies are likely to remain popular, even if Russia gains control of major portions of Ukraine.
If America involuntarily is dragged into a major role in Ukraine, then Biden’s current popularity rating will plummet. This greater public antipathy towards him could have the effect of making competitive various Congressional races in New Jersey where the Democratic incumbent currently has a prohibitive advantage. Examples of such incumbents include Andy Kim (3rd), Josh Gottheimer (5th), and Mikie Sherrill (11th)
The case of Tom Malinowski is different. He has an encyclopedic knowledge of foreign policy, due to his previous experience as Assistant Secretary of State in the Obama administration.
If Tom Malinowski offers cogent, comprehensive, and comprehensible European policy alternatives to those of the Biden administration, then Malinowski’s campaign could survive Biden‘s widening involvement in Ukraine.
There is one possible consequence of the war in Ukraine that Malinowski could not and will not politically survive: A dramatic continuing rise in the price of oil. Such a skyrocketing oil price will cause an overall astronomical increase in the consumer price index and a national landslide takeover by the Republicans of both the House and Senate – including Tom Malinowski’s Seventh New Jersey Congressional District. Tom Kean, Jr. would become Congressman Tom Kean, Jr. in January, 2023.
The headline for my column yesterday was, “If Inflation Recedes, Tom Kean, Jr. Will Lose.” The headline today could conversely be, “If Inflation Accelerates, Tom Malinowski Will Lose”
The first economic news item that Tom Malinowski and Tom Kean, Jr. will check every day until Election Day will be the price of oil.
As for me personally, after I completed my four-part series on the Malinowski v. Kean, Jr. race this week, I thought I would be taking a break from that particular campaign for a while. Now I feel like Michael Corleone in The Godfather, Part 3. Just when I thought I was out, they pull me back in!
Alan J. Steinberg served as regional administrator of Region 2 EPA during the administration of former President George W. Bush and as executive director of the New Jersey Meadowlands Commission.
Unfortunate that you had to write a fifth column, Alan Steinberg,. I read the five columns about Malinowski and Kean,Jr. and found them interesting, insightful, and informative.
I feel that that I don’t have the wisdom or knowledge to comment on this column in a meaningful way…,…..
Nevertheless, I will speak my piece, soon to be deleted by the powers that be.
What we need now, perhaps more than ever, are legislators with an abundance of wisdom, knowledge, stability, common sense, and a strong, deep desire to truly be of service. Legislators who can think clearly and independently. This is NOT the time for brash,
self-seeking, ego-boosting politicians.
I think that both Kean, Jr. and Malinowski both want to represent their constituents fairly and wisely,
but Tom Kean,Jt. is solidly in the Trump camp.
Gas prices, inflation probably won’t affect my voting
decision. The incompetence of Trump/Trumpism
still looms heavily on any decision I make.
Hello Kathleen, I did notice that one of your comments on another article has disappeared. Don’t remember what you said, but can’t imagine you said anything bad. You always praise the Dems, and almost always disparage the Reps. Do you think the deletion was a ‘glitch’ in the new (sub-standard) commenting system, or just a petty act of censorship? One of my comments disappeared as well. Just wondering what your opinion might be.