Monmouth Poll: Local Quality of Life in NJ Declining

More than 6 in 10 New Jerseyans continue to give positive ratings to their home state as a place to live, but views of some local aspects of the state’s quality of life have declined, particularly around schools and safety. The Monmouth University Poll’s benchmark index rating has remained stable due to offsetting partisan shifts in opinion, with Republicans feeling more negative than at the beginning of the year and Democrats feeling more positive.

Monmouth’s exclusive Garden State Quality of Life Index score now stands at +23, which is similar to January’s +24 rating and slightly lower than last year’s +27 rating. The current reading is near the midpoint of scores since Monmouth first started tracking the quality of life index in 2010. The index number jumped to +37 at the beginning of the Covid pandemic in April 2020, but dropped back to +25 in May 2021. In prior years, the index rating ranged between +18 and +31, with an outlying low point of +13 registered in February 2019.

The statewide index score has held steady since the beginning of the year, but there have been some regional shifts. Specifically, the index score has dropped in counties making up the Northern Shore (from +35 to +23) and Garden Core (from +14 to +2) regions. It has gone up in the Delaware Valley region (from +19 to +29) and held steady elsewhere. The Central Hills region (+38) continues to record the highest quality of life index score.

These regional shifts correlate with a change in partisan views of New Jersey’s quality of life. The Garden State Quality of Life Index score has dropped among Republicans (from +16 to +5) since January, at the same time it has risen among Democrats (from +37 to +46) and held steady among independents (from +17 to +16). The Northern Shore and Garden Core regions are significantly more Republican than other parts of the state.

“As with everything in society today, how people view what’s going on in their own backyards seems to be filtered through a partisan lens,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute.

The Garden State Quality of Life Index was created by the Monmouth University Polling Institute in 2010 to serve as a resident-based indicator of the quality of life offered by the state of New Jersey. The index is based on five separate poll questions: overall opinion of the state as a place to live – which contributes half the index score – and ratings of one’s hometown, the performance of local schools, the quality of the local environment, and feelings of safety in one’s own neighborhood. The index can potentially range from –100 to +100.

 

GARDEN STATE QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX

NJ TOTAL

GENDER

AGE

RACE

INCOME

Male

Female

18-34

35-54

55+

White

Black/ Hispanic

<$50K

$50-100K

>$100K

August 2023

+23

+17

+28

+23

+20

+25

+30

+11

+13

+15

+34

January 2023

+24

+21

+28

+29

+23

+22

+31

+15

+7

+27

+31

April 2022

+27

+24

+30

+24

+25

+31

+30

+23

+18

+24

+35

May 2021

+25

+20

+29

+24

+24

+27

+25

+20

+17

+25

+31

April 2020

+37

+34

+41

+34

+38

+40

+43

+26

+29

+37

+44

September 2019

+24

+21

+26

+21

+20

+32

+31

+13

+18

+20

+33

February 2019

+13

+14

+12

+10

+11

+18

+17

+4

+2

+14

+20

April 2018

+18

+16

+20

+22

+14

+20

+22

+5

+8

+16

+27

July 2017

+25

+25

+24

+15

+26

+30

+32

+6

+8

+23

+41

July 2015

+18

+18

+18

+25

+11

+20

+24

+5

n/a

n/a

n/a

February 2015

+23

+21

+26

+26

+18

+28

+29

+10

+13

+30

+31

September 2014

+18

+19

+17

+12

+20

+20

+23

+5

+13

+15

+30

April 2014

+25

+24

+25

+31

+20

+25

+27

+16

+17

+24

+33

February 2014

+23

+28

+18

+23

+21

+26

+27

+11

+8

+23

+35

December 2013

+24

+25

+23

+24

+21

+27

+29

+10

+10

+24

+35

September 2013

+26

+26

+26

+27

+23

+30

+33

+10

+17

+25

+42

April 2013

+21

+19

+24

+19

+19

+27

+29

+3

+12

+19

+35

February 2013

+29

+28

+30

+30

+27

+31

+36

+12

+20

+30

+36

December 2012

+30

+31

+29

+30

+30

+30

+36

+14

+17

+33

+38

September 2012

+24

+28

+20

+16

+21

+32

+30

+5

+10

+23

+37

July 2012

+27

+26

+29

+21

+31

+30

+32

+16

+16

+31

+37

April 2012

+31

+33

+28

+25

+30

+37

+36

+19

+24

+28

+42

February 2012

+25

+20

+30

+25

+24

+26

+29

+13

+17

+23

+38

October 2011

+24

+24

+24

+23

+21

+29

+31

+7

+15

+25

+31

August 2011

+22

+25

+19

+27

+19

+21

+26

+9

+9

+22

+32

May 2011

+23

+24

+22

+23

+22

+23

+26

+14

+15

+22

+32

December 2010

+21

+20

+23

+23

+20

+23

+26

+13

+15

+21

+31

 

GARDEN STATE QUALITY OF LIFE INDEX

REGION

COMMUNITY TYPE

North

East

Urban Core

Route 1 Corridor

Central Hills

Northern Shore

Delaware Valley

Garden Core

Urban

Stable Town

Growing

Suburb

August 2023

+26

+15

+26

+38

+23

+29

+2

+8

+29

+24

January 2023

+25

+15

+24

+40

+35

+19

+14

0

+29

+33

April 2022

+28

+16

+28

+42

+34

+27

+19

+15

+31

+31

May 2021

+31

+23

+23

+33

+26

+20

+13

+20

+26

+26

April 2020

+41

+30

+40

+49

+46

+33

+21

+18

+41

+45

September 2019

+20

+10

+23

+42

+32

+26

+17

+6

+30

+30

February 2019

+21

-1

+16

+27

+21

-3

+9

-1

+15

+19

April 2018

+24

+8

+18

+34

+18

+14

+11

+2

+23

+24

July 2017

+25

+18

+34

+33

+35

+22

+13

+7

+31

+29

July 2015

+21

+4

+22

+35

+22

+17

+10

-2

+28

+23

February 2015

+31

+13

+24

+38

+31

+11

+19

+11

+30

+27

September 2014

+23

+8

+12

+42

+27

+18

+4

+10

+22

+19

April 2014

+24

+10

+22

+43

+29

+25

+23

+4

+26

+33

February 2014

+27

+16

+20

+37

+30

+14

+16

+6

+28

+28

December 2013

+31

+15

+26

+40

+25

+14

+17

+5

+29

+30

September 2013

+27

+8

+21

+52

+33

+27

+19

+1

+34

+32

April 2013

+31

+4

+19

+38

+22

+21

+21

-3

+30

+27

February 2013

+31

+17

+35

+37

+36

+25

+23

+11

+33

+36

December 2012

+36

+18

+26

+47

+40

+21

+31

+9

+37

+37

September 2012

+29

+14

+17

+45

+33

+26

+13

-1

+27

+31

July 2012

+37

+12

+30

+37

+34

+22

+18

+8

+34

+34

April 2012

+38

+26

+27

+44

+34

+22

+28

+20

+35

+36

February 2012

+33

+17

+27

+35

+29

+19

+22

+11

+31

+29

October 2011

+31

+6

+22

+45

+35

+18

+23

-1

+31

+34

August 2011

+24

+16

+21

+38

+27

+26

+6

+4

+29

+25

May 2011

+28

+17

+16

+41

+29

+22

+20

+6

+29

+28

December 2010

+26

+15

+22

+38

+23

+14

+17

+12

+23

+27

Examining individual components of the index finds that more than 6 in 10 New Jerseyans say the state is either an excellent (20%) or good (42%) place to live, while 25% say it is only fair and 12% rate the state as poor. The current positive rating of 62% is similar to recent poll results (63% in January 2023 and 64% in April 2022). The all-time high mark for this rating was 84% positive in February 1987. The record low was 50% in February 2019, but it improved to 61% by September of that year.

While state-level rating results have remained steady, some local metrics in the Garden State Quality of Life Index have dipped since the beginning of the year. Specifically, 70% of residents currently rate their own town or city as an excellent or good place to live. This is down from 77% who said the same in January but close to the 73% positive result in Monmouth’s 2022 poll. This rating has been given to fluctuations over the past decade, with a range of 67% to 79% since 2013. New Jerseyans’ ratings for environmental quality in their local area have been stable, currently at 75% positive, which is similar to both the beginning of this year (78%) and last year (76%).

The poll finds larger declines, however, in two areas – local schools and public safety. Currently, 56% of New Jerseyans rate their local schools as either excellent or good. This number stood at 60% positive in January and 63% positive last year. While the school rating did hover just above 50% positive for most of the late 1970s into the early 1990s, it has rarely dipped below the 60% mark in polling in the past three decades (hitting 59% in February 2019 and April 2013). Prior to the current poll, the previous low point for positive ratings of local schools was 52% in September 1993.

The percentage of New Jerseyans who currently feel very safe in their own neighborhoods at night stands at 58%, which is lower than 64% in January and 65% in 2022. This marks only the second time since 2010 that this metric fell below the 60% mark (58% in September 2014 and 59% in December 2010). It has generally ranged between 60% and 68% very safe while topping 70% on two occasions (71% in July 2017 and 74% in April 2020). However, polls taken in the 1980s and 1990s found a much lower sense of security among Garden State residents (between 42% and 53% very safe).

            “Schools and safety have been hot-button topics for the past few years. It should come as no surprise that political clashes over these issues are having an impact on how New Jerseyans view their own quality of life in the state,” said Murray.

The Monmouth University Poll was conducted by telephone from August 10 to 14, 2023 with 814 New Jersey adults. The question results in this release have a margin of error of +/- 5.4 percentage points for the full sample. The poll was conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute in West Long Branch, NJ.

 

QUESTIONS AND RESULTS                                                                        

(* Some columns may not add to 100% due to rounding.)

1.        Overall, how would you rate New Jersey as a place to live – excellent, good, only fair, or poor?

Trend*:

Excellent/

Good

Excellent

Good

Only Fair

Poor

(VOL)

Don’t know

(n)

August 2023

62%

20%

42%

25%

12%

0%

(814)

January 2023

63%

18%

45%

25%

12%

0%

(809)

April 2022

64%

19%

45%

22%

13%

1%

(802)

May 2021

59%

16%

43%

27%

14%

0%

(706)

April 2020

68%

24%

44%

23%

7%

1%

(704)

September 2019

61%

15%

46%

26%

12%

1%

(713)

February 2019

50%

11%

39%

32%

17%

1%

(604)

April 2018

54%

15%

39%

29%

17%

1%

(703)

July 2017

59%

15%

44%

28%

13%

0%

(800)

May 2016

62%

16%

46%

28%

10%

0%

(806)

July 2015

55%

12%

43%

30%

15%

0%

(503)

May 2015

63%

13%

50%

27%

10%

1%

(500)

February 2015

63%

15%

48%

25%

11%

1%

(805)

September 2014

61%

13%

48%

25%

13%

1%

(802)

June 2014

62%

15%

47%

26%

11%

0%

(800)

April 2014

64%

15%

49%

26%

10%

0%

(803)

February 2014

63%

15%

48%

26%

11%

0%

(803)

December 2013

65%

20%

45%

26%

9%

0%

(802)

September 2013

65%

19%

46%

25%

10%

1%

(783)

April 2013

61%

15%

46%

27%

11%

0%

(806)

February 2013

68%

18%

50%

24%

7%

1%

(803)

December 2012

72%

20%

52%

21%

5%

1%

(816)

September 2012

65%

15%

50%

23%

11%

0%

(805)

July 2012

69%

17%

52%

23%

8%

0%

(803)

April 2012

70%

20%

50%

23%

7%

0%

(804)

February 2012

62%

15%

47%

26%

11%

1%

(803)

October 2011

67%

15%

52%

24%

8%

0%

(817)

August 2011

57%

14%

43%

31%

11%

1%

(802)

May 2011

59%

14%

45%

29%

11%

0%

(807)

December 2010

63%

17%

46%

26%

10%

1%

(2864)

October 2007

63%

17%

46%

25%

12%

1%

(1001)

August 2004

68%

22%

46%

21%

10%

1%

(800)

May 2003

72%

20%

52%

23%

5%

0%

(1002)

April 2001

76%

23%

53%

19%

4%

1%

(802)

March 2000

76%

25%

51%

17%

6%

0%

(800)

May 1999

76%

22%

54%

19%

5%

0%

(800)

February 1994

71%

18%

53%

22%

7%

0%

(801)

March 1990

68%

21%

47%

25%

6%

1%

(800)

February 1988

78%

27%

51%

17%

4%

1%

(800)

February 1987

84%

31%

53%

11%

4%

0%

(800)

May 1985

81%

29%

52%

14%

3%

1%

(500)

October 1984

80%

29%

51%

15%

4%

1%

(1000)

January 1981

66%

16%

50%

26%

7%

1%

(1003)

July 1980

68%

18%

50%

23%

7%

2%

(1005)

[Q2-12 previously released.]

13.      How would you rate your town or city as a place to live – excellent, good, only fair, or poor?

Trend*:

Excellent/

Good

Excellent

Good

Only Fair

Poor

(VOL)

Don’t know

(n)

August 2023

70%

28%

42%

22%

7%

0%

(814)

January 2023

77%

34%

43%

18%

5%

0%

(809)

April 2022

73%

32%

41%

20%

7%

0%

(802)

May 2021

76%

33%

43%

19%

5%

0%

(706)

April 2020

79%

39%

40%

16%

5%

0%

(704)

September 2019

72%

32%

40%

20%

7%

0%

(713)

February 2019

67%

30%

37%

21%

11%

0%

(604)

April 2018

71%

30%

41%

20%

9%

0%

(703)

July 2017

77%

37%

40%

16%

7%

0%

(800)

July 2015

71%

29%

42%

19%

10%

0%

(503)

February 2015

72%

29%

43%

21%

7%

0%

(805)

September 2014

69%

24%

45%

22%

10%

0%

(802)

April 2014

71%

27%

44%

20%

9%

0%

(803)

February 2014

70%

31%

39%

23%

7%

0%

(803)

December 2013

70%

29%

41%

21%

8%

1%

(802)

September 2013

72%

32%

40%

18%

9%

1%

(783)

April 2013

67%

29%

38%

25%

8%

0%

(806)

February 2013

73%

30%

43%

20%

7%

0%

(803)

December 2012

74%

32%

42%

17%

9%

0%

(816)

September 2012

72%

33%

39%

19%

9%

0%

(805)

July 2012

74%

32%

42%

18%

7%

1%

(803)

April 2012

76%

34%

42%

17%

7%

0%

(804)

February 2012

74%

33%

41%

21%

5%

0%

(803)

October 2011

73%

26%

47%

20%

8%

0%

(817)

August 2011

76%

28%

48%

18%

6%

0%

(802)

May 2011

73%

33%

40%

20%

7%

0%

(807)

December 2010

73%

27%

46%

20%

8%

0%

(2864)

May 2003

74%

29%

45%

19%

7%

0%

(1002)

April 2001

73%

28%

45%

21%

6%

0%

(802)

May 1995

70%

30%

40%

21%

8%

0%

(802)

June 1994

72%

31%

41%

19%

9%

0%

(801)

September 1988

72%

26%

46%

18%

9%

1%

(500)

October 1984

71%

30%

41%

21%

7%

1%

(999)

June 1980

67%

23%

44%

24%

9%

0%

(1005)

May 1977

66%

25%

41%

24%

10%

0%

(1005)

 

[QUESTIONS 14-16 WERE ROTATED]

14.      How would you rate the quality of the environment in the area where you live – excellent, good, only fair, or poor?

Trend*:

Excellent/

Good

Excellent

Good

Only Fair

Poor

(VOL)

Don’t know

(n)

August 2023

75%

28%

47%

19%

5%

1%

(814)

January 2023

78%

30%

48%

17%

5%

1%

(809)

April 2022

76%

31%

45%

17%

7%

0%

(802)

May 2021

76%

32%

44%

18%

6%

0%

(706)

April 2020

81%

36%

45%

15%

4%

0%

(704)

September 2019

72%

31%

41%

22%

6%

1%

(713)

February 2019

71%

27%

44%

21%

8%

0%

(604)

April 2018

73%

29%

44%

20%

6%

1%

(703)

July 2017

76%

37%

39%

14%

8%

1%

(800)

July 2015

71%

27%

44%

20%

9%

0%

(503)

February 2015

72%

27%

45%

23%

4%

0%

(805)

September 2014

72%

24%

48%

21%

5%

1%

(802)

April 2014

76%

27%

49%

18%

6%

0%

(803)

February 2014

73%

29%

44%

21%

6%

0%

(803)

December 2013

69%

27%

42%

24%

7%

0%

(802)

September 2013

75%

30%

45%

18%

7%

1%

(783)

April 2013

70%

27%

43%

22%

7%

0%

(806)

February 2013

71%

26%

45%

24%

4%

2%

(803)

December 2012

73%

25%

48%

20%

7%

1%

(816)

September 2012

72%

30%

42%

20%

7%

0%

(805)

July 2012

74%

30%

44%

19%

7%

1%

(803)

April 2012

75%

30%

45%

18%

6%

1%

(804)

February 2012

77%

29%

48%

17%

5%

0%

(803)

October 2011

72%

25%

47%

19%

9%

0%

(817)

August 2011

79%

31%

48%

16%

5%

0%

(802)

May 2011

79%

33%

46%

15%

6%

0%

(807)

December 2010

66%

14%

52%

25%

9%

0%

(2864)

April 2001

70%

27%

43%

22%

7%

1%

(402)

September 1988

53%

10%

43%

31%

15%

1%

(500)

15.      How would you rate the job your local schools are doing – excellent, good, only fair, or poor?

Trend*:

Excellent/

Good

Excellent

Good

Only Fair

Poor

(VOL)

Don’t know

(n)

August 2023

56%

22%

34%

23%

15%

6%

(814)

January 2023

60%

19%

41%

22%

11%

6%

(809)

April 2022

63%

24%

39%

16%

11%

10%

(802)

May 2021

64%

24%

40%

18%

8%

10%

(706)

April 2020

73%

33%

40%

16%

4%

7%

(704)

September 2019

60%

26%

34%

23%

9%

9%

(713)

February 2019

59%

19%

40%

22%

10%

9%

(604)

April 2018

60%

24%

36%

23%

10%

7%

(703)

July 2017

65%

26%

39%

20%

10%

6%

(800)

July 2015

60%

27%

33%

22%

9%

8%

(503)

February 2015

61%

21%

40%

24%

8%

7%

(805)

September 2014

60%

21%

39%

24%

9%

7%

(802)

April 2014

63%

24%

39%

22%

9%

6%

(803)

February 2014

61%

22%

39%

22%

10%

7%

(803)

December 2013

60%

20%

40%

23%

12%

5%

(802)

September 2013

62%

24%

38%

21%

7%

9%

(783)

April 2013

59%

21%

38%

27%

9%

5%

(806)

February 2013

64%

24%

40%

20%

7%

9%

(803)

December 2012

61%

21%

40%

23%

7%

9%

(816)

September 2012

61%

27%

34%

21%

10%

8%

(805)

July 2012

61%

22%

39%

20%

11%

8%

(803)

April 2012

63%

23%

40%

21%

7%

8%

(804)

February 2012

68%

26%

42%

16%

8%

8%

(803)

October 2011

60%

21%

39%

20%

13%

7%

(817)

August 2011

63%

19%

44%

26%

6%

5%

(802)

May 2011

63%

24%

39%

22%

10%

6%

(807)

December 2010

64%

24%

40%

23%

8%

5%

(2864)

August 2004

61%

24%

37%

17%

12%

9%

(800)

April 2001

64%

21%

43%

21%

6%

9%

(802)

September 1999

62%

18%

44%

21%

9%

8%

(802)

September 1998

62%

20%

42%

23%

9%

7%

(804)

February 1996

60%

20%

40%

20%

11%

9%

(804)

September 1993

52%

16%

36%

29%

14%

5%

(801)

January 1992

53%

15%

38%

26%

15%

5%

(800)

October 1987

60%

14%

46%

23%

6%

11%

(500)

October 1986

55%

15%

40%

26%

10%

9%

(800)

October 1983

59%

16%

43%

23%

10%

8%

(802)

May 1978

52%

12%

40%

25%

12%

11%

(1003)

16.      How safe do you feel in your neighborhood at night – very safe, somewhat safe, or not at all safe?

Trend*:

Very safe

Somewhat safe

Not at all safe

(VOL)

Don’t know

(n)

August 2023

58%

36%

5%

0%

(814)

January 2023

64%

32%

4%

1%

(809)

April 2022

65%

29%

5%

0%

(802)

May 2021

67%

31%

2%

0%

(706)

April 2020

74%

22%

3%

1%

(704)

September 2019

68%

27%

5%

0%

(713)

February 2019

64%

29%

7%

0%

(604)

April 2018

65%

29%

5%

0%

(703)

July 2017

71%

22%

6%

0%

(800)

July 2015

67%

27%

6%

0%

(503)

February 2015

62%

33%

4%

0%

(805)

September 2014

58%

36%

6%

0%

(802)

April 2014

66%

30%

4%

1%

(803)

February 2014

67%

28%

6%

0%

(803)

December 2013

60%

33%

7%

0%

(802)

September 2013

65%

27%

7%

1%

(783)

April 2013

66%

28%

6%

0%

(806)

February 2013

63%

30%

6%

1%

(803)

December 2012

64%

29%

6%

1%

(816)

September 2012

65%

25%

6%

0%

(805)

July 2012

60%

32%

7%

1%

(803)

April 2012

64%

31%

5%

1%

(804)

February 2012

62%

32%

5%

0%

(803)

October 2011

62%

31%

7%

0%

(817)

August 2011

63%

31%

6%

0%

(802)

May 2011

68%

27%

5%

0%

(807)

December 2010

59%

35%

6%

0%

(2864)

February 1993

42%

44%

13%

0%

(801)

October 1987

51%

36%

11%

2%

(499)

October 1984

53%

36%

9%

2%

(500)

May 1981

43%

43%

13%

1%

(497)

[Q17-47 previously released.]

* Note:  All trend results prior to 2005 come from Rutgers University’s Eagleton Poll.

 

METHODOLOGY

The Monmouth University Poll was sponsored and conducted by the Monmouth University Polling Institute from August 10 to 14, 2023 with a probability-based random sample of 814 New Jersey adults age 18 and older. Interviews were conducted in English, and included 245 live landline telephone interviews, 360 live cell phone interviews, and 209 online surveys via a cell phone text invitation. Telephone numbers were selected through random digit dialing and landline respondents were selected with a modified Troldahl-Carter youngest adult household screen. Monmouth is responsible for all aspects of the survey design, data weighting and analysis. The full sample is weighted for region, age, education, gender and race based on US Census information (ACS 2021 one-year survey). Interviewing services were provided by Braun Research, with sample obtained from Dynata.  For results based on this sample, one can say with 95% confidence that the error attributable to sampling has a maximum margin of plus or minus 5.4 percentage points adjusted for sample design effects (1.56). Sampling error can be larger for sub-groups (see table below). In addition to sampling error, one should bear in mind that question wording and practical difficulties in conducting surveys can introduce error or bias into the findings of opinion polls.

Standard Region (by county):

North – Bergen, Essex, Hudson, Morris, Passaic, Sussex, Union, Warren

Central – Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Somerset

South – Atlantic, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Gloucester, Ocean, Salem

Expanded Region (by county):  Northeast (Bergen, Passaic), Urban Core (Essex, Hudson), Route 1 Corridor (Mercer, Middlesex, Union), Central Hills (Hunterdon, Morris, Somerset), Northern Shore (Monmouth, Ocean), Delaware Valley (Burlington, Camden, Gloucester), Garden Core (Atlantic, Cape May, Cumberland, Salem, Sussex, Warren).

Demographics (weighted)

Party (self-reported): 22% Republican, 43% Independent, 35% Democrat

Sex: 49% Male, 51% Female

Age: 27% 18-34, 34% 35-54, 39% 55+

Race: 55% White, 13% Black, 19% Hispanic, 13% Asian/Other

College: 58% No degree, 42% 4 year degree

MARGIN OF ERROR

unweighted  sample

moe(+/-)

TOTAL

 

814

5.4%

REGISTERED VOTER

Yes

778

5.5%

No

36

25.5%

SELF-REPORTED PARTY ID

Republican

163

12.0%

Independent

347

8.2%

Democrat

280

9.1%

REGION

North

379

7.9%

Central

247

9.7%

South

179

11.4%

GENDER

Male

393

7.7%

Female

421

7.5%

AGE

18-34

165

11.9%

35-54

299

8.9%

55+

333

8.4%

RACE

White, non-Hispanic

547

6.6%

Other

248

9.7%

COLLEGE GRADUATE

No degree

293

8.9%

4 year degree

516

6.7%

INCOME

<$50K

110

14.6%

$50 to <$100K

227

10.2%

$100K+

406

7.6%

CHILDREN IN HOME

Yes

186

11.2%

No

620

6.2%

 

Crosstabs may be found in the PDF file on the report webpage:  https://www.monmouth.edu/polling-institute/reports/monmouthpoll_NJ_092023/

(Visited 140 times, 1 visits today)

One response to “Monmouth Poll: Local Quality of Life in NJ Declining”

  1. According to the Monmouth U. poll, New Jerseyans say quality of life in NJ has gone down in schools and safety. What’s left??? Democrazy Governor Phil KNUCKLEHEAD Murphy says people want to stay or move to New Jersey because of our “such great” schools and crime is “down”. Obviously, Governor KNUCKLEHEAD has been lying to New Jerseyans about everything else, but the schools are a surprise.

    But, NJ schools declining should be no surprise to any New Jerseyan who has lived here for a while. New Jersey graduation rates are falling precipitously. Many New Jersey schools can’t even graduate students at a 12th grade level. Yet, the NJ Dept. of Ed. and their co-conspirator, the NJEA, are hell-bent on destroying our educational system here by invoking indoctrination instead of education. They want to promote and coerce NJ parents to have their children accept CRT, LGBTQ and Trans Agendas, instead of teaching children reading, writing, math, sciences, English, US History, World History to give children the opportunity to succeed in the labor force, ultimately to succeed in life. Instead, our Communist run Legislature, and agencies are more intent than ever to destroy children and families with divisive indoctrination programs being taught in the schools.

    If our schools are going down in quality, what’s left to stay in NJ??? New Jersey ranks No.1 in highest property taxes in the nation, Top 3 or 4 in traffic congestion, Top 5 in crime increase, and the Top 3 or 4 in income taxes. Quality of life is no longer satisfactory in this state once schools start declining. There is nothing to stay in New Jersey for anymore.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

News From Around the Web

The Political Landscape