Click image for PDF.
First and foremost, let me say that the manner in which this was handled was wrong and I take responsibility for my role in the process. I should have been more vigilant as to the actions of Borough employees and more thoughtful in my personal response. In retrospect, I should have researched the matter independently of the Borough Administrator and Borough Attorney as I have had many issues in the past with each of them. After my research, I rescinded the bill and apologized for sending it. Nobody is perfect, least not me.
I respect Emily’s opinion and her right to stand up for what she believes. Those rights are enshrined in our Constitution and I am heartened to see our young people engaging in the civic process so passionately.
The news media has reported that I unilaterally sent this young resident an invoice for just under $2,500, and that no one else in local government was aware. This is simply not true and I am writing to you today to set the record straight.
Recently, an article in The Record reported that our Borough Administrator – a holdover from the previous Democratic Administration – and some Democratic Council Members sought to claim that they had no knowledge of the related correspondence with this resident, nor knowledge of the letter that was ultimately sent to her. This is simply false.
Sadly, they – as they do with most things – have tried to turn this into a political attack on me as a means to push through their settlement as it relates to the development of high-density residential housing at 800 Sylvan.
The truth is Borough Administrator Duffy drafted the very letter she claims not to know about, verifying the amount to be billed with Chief Henkelman. Ms. Duffy then included that dollar amount in the letter she prepared and sent it to me for review. This is the very letter with the invoice amount she claims never to have seen. The attached emails prove that beyond a shadow of a doubt. Please review them for yourself. |